Gal, I sent you a PM.  I don’t think the Geode community can help with this 
question.

Anthony

> On Jan 29, 2017, at 4:58 AM, Gal Palmery <gal.palm...@amdocs.com> wrote:
> 
> I'll edit the mail a bit (it was in a table when I sent it, but I see that 
> it's  not very clear) -->
> 
> Can anyone say if the fixes for the below Gemfire support tickets are 
> included in the last geode release:
> 1) 15611661002 - FIXED in GemFire 8.0.0.10 - gfsh fails to connect to locator 
> when executng a pre-configuration script, but returns 0
> 2) 15674334505 - fixed in GemFire 8.2 - NPE in map index when field of type 
> Map == null
> 3) 16972460504 - FIXED in GemFire 8.2.0.1 - Gemfire server disconnected after 
> large GC pause 
> 4) 16972415504 - FIXED in GemFire 8.2.0.7 - Different results in OQL queries 
> for the same entity (using GFSH): one query is for all entities in a region, 
> and the second is for the specific entity.
> 
> Thanks,
> Gal
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gal Palmery 
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 16:07
> To: dev@geode.apache.org
> Subject: are these gemfire bug fixes included in the last geode release?
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Can anyone say if the fixes for the below Gemfire support tickets are 
> included in the last geode release:
> 
> Support ticket
> 
> Issue
> 
> Status
> 
> Comment
> 
> 15611661002
> 
> gfsh fails to connect to locator when executng a pre-configuration script, 
> but returns 0
> 
> FIXED
> 
> FIXED in GemFire 8.0.0.10
> 
> 15674334505
> 
> NPE in map index when field of type Map == null
> 
> FIXED
> 
> fixed in GemFire 8.2
> 
> 16972460504
> 
> Gemfire server disconnected after large GC pause
> 
> FIXED
> 
> FIXED in GemFire 8.2.0.1
> 
> 16972415504
> 
> Different results in OQL queries for the same entity (using GFSH): one query 
> is for all entities in a region, and the second is for the specific entity.
> 
> FIXED
> 
> FIXED in GemFire 8.2.0.7
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Gal
> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
> confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
> 
> you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp
> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
> confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
> 
> you may review at http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp
> 

Reply via email to