One other thought...Maybe now is the time to drop the term "native".
-- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771 On Jan 23, 2017 11:29 AM, "Michael William Dodge" <mdo...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1 for apache-geode and Apache.Geode > > > On 22 Jan, 2017, at 19:08, Ernest Burghardt <eburgha...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > > +1 for apache-geode (.dll, .so, .dylib) and Apache.Geode.dll > > > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Michael Martell <mmart...@pivotal.io> > > wrote: > > > >> +1 for apache-geode (.dll, .so, .dylib) and Apache.Geode.dll > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> As I ready to drop the pull request to rename all the namespaces in C++ > >> and > >>> .NET sources the next thing we need to decide on is the filename for > the > >>> library. > >>> > >>> C++ > >>> Current: gfcppcache > >>> gfcppcache.dll (Windows), libgfcppcache.so (*nix), libgfcppcache.dylib > >>> (macOS) > >>> Proposed: apache-geode > >>> apache-geode.dll, libapache-geode.so, libapache-geode.dylib > >>> Other libraries have embraced other styles for "branded" libraries. > >>> Camel case: libQtCode.so > >>> Underscore: libsvn_client.so, libboost_atomic-mt.so > >>> Dash: libxcb-compose, libcairo-gobject.so > >>> I prefere dash because I don't have to hit shift. ;) > >>> > >>> .NET > >>> Current: GemStone.GemFire.Cache.dll > >>> Proposed: Apache.Geode.dll > >>> There is a bit more of an established norm. It should be part of the > >>> included namespace. > >>> Other option is Apache.Geode.Client.dll but I feel like there are items > >> in > >>> the Client namespace that need to be moved into another namespace as a > >>> sibling. So in my mind it makes more sense to have it be > >> Apache.Geode.dll. > >>> It also makes it consistent with the C++ library. > >>> > >>> -Jake > >>> > >> > >
