On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > I wonder if we're trying to overcomplicate things there. I don't see why > the geode-examples wouldn't use the same release schedule and version > number as geode. > > The C++ and .NET clients are also somewhat tied to the version of geode > that they support. As long as we can stick to a regular release cadence, It > seems like those clients couldn't also follow the same release schedule and > version numbers.
Huge +1 to the above! Thanks, Roman.
