I’m cautiously in favor of this idea. Allowing independent parts (geode, geode-examples, geode-native) to progress and release at their own pace seems like a good thing.
From a release perspective, I think each repo would have separate vote threads and a section on our release page: http://geode.apache.org/releases/ Anthony > On Jan 16, 2017, at 11:24 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > I would love a separate repo. Someone told me that wasn't an option. If > it's an option the let's make it so. > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:20 AM Mark Bretl <mbr...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Jake, >> >> Having all the clients in the repository is nice, however, has there been >> thought to have them in their own repository? Now that we are a TLP, we do >> have that capability, as seen with the 'geode-examples' repository. >> >> --Mark >> >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Udo Kohlmeyer <ukohlme...@pivotal.io> >> wrote:
