[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEARPUMP-359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16220004#comment-16220004
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEARPUMP-359:
-----------------------------------------

GitHub user huafengw opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-gearpump/pull/234

    [GEARPUMP-359] Fix OutputWatermark advancing logic in Subscription

    Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution
    quickly and easily:
    
     - [ ] Make sure the commit message is formatted like:
       `[GEARPUMP-<Jira issue #>] Meaningful description of pull request` 
     - [ ] Make sure tests pass via `sbt clean test`.
     - [ ] Make sure old documentation affected by the pull request has been 
updated and new documentation added for new functionality. 
    


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/huafengw/incubator-gearpump subs

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-gearpump/pull/234.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #234
    
----
commit 311e09b28ebe8ac8525b447e831615065dcc541c
Author: huafengw <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-10-26T05:52:39Z

    [GEARPUMP-359] Fix OutputWatermark advancing logic in Subscription

----


> The premature OutputWatermark advancing logic in Subscription is not right
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEARPUMP-359
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEARPUMP-359
>             Project: Apache Gearpump
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Huafeng Wang
>            Assignee: Huafeng Wang
>
> {{Subscription}} will update processingWatermark when sending a message and 
> update outputWatermark when receiving an Ack message. It will cause 
> prematurely updating the outputWatermark in such scenario: the 
> {{Subscription}} already sent 200 messages to downstream and now the 
> processingWatermark is 200th message's watermark, then it receives the first 
> 100 messages' Ack and it will advance the outputWatermark to 200th message's 
> watermark, not the 100th one, which is wrong.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to