Thanks Keith for driving it.
I'm +1 to use clients.fluss.apache.org since it's not just for rust client, but 
also for cpp, python and more other languages in the future. And since 
clients.fluss.apache.org also 
link to the java client. It's reasonable to me to use clients.fluss.apache.org.

Best regards,
Yuxia

----- 原始邮件 -----
发件人: "ForwardXu" <[email protected]>
收件人: "dev" <[email protected]>
发送时间: 星期一, 2026年 3 月 02日 下午 8:39:55
主题: [SPAM]Re:Setting up domain name for fluss-rust documentation

Hi Keith,
Thanks for driving this initiative.
I fully support the proposal to host fluss-rust documentation on 
clients.fluss.apache.org. As fluss-rust continues to evolve and accumulate more 
features, it becomes increasingly necessary to establish a dedicated, 
independent website for its documentation. This will significantly improve 
discoverability, organization, and user experience for developers working with 
the Rust client, separating it cleanly from the core project materials.
Looking forward to seeing this progress.
Best regards,
ForwardXu
         原始邮件
         
       
发件人:Keith Lee <[email protected]&gt;
发件时间:2026年3月2日 17:10
收件人:dev <[email protected]&gt;
主题:Setting up domain name for fluss-rust documentation



       Hello&nbsp;dev,&nbsp;PMCs,

I&nbsp;am&nbsp;working&nbsp;towards&nbsp;setting&nbsp;up&nbsp;fluss-rust&nbsp;documentation&nbsp;to&nbsp;be&nbsp;hosted&nbsp;on
the&nbsp;proposed&nbsp;domain&nbsp;name&nbsp;`clients.fluss.apache.org`&nbsp;[1][2].&nbsp;This&nbsp;email
seeks&nbsp;to&nbsp;gather&nbsp;feedback&nbsp;(if&nbsp;any)&nbsp;and&nbsp;get&nbsp;approval&nbsp;from&nbsp;at&nbsp;least&nbsp;1&nbsp;PMC,&nbsp;so
that&nbsp;I&nbsp;can&nbsp;use&nbsp;this&nbsp;thread&nbsp;as&nbsp;reference&nbsp;to&nbsp;PMC&nbsp;approval&nbsp;which&nbsp;ASF&nbsp;Infra
will&nbsp;need.

Ref
[1]&nbsp;https://github.com/apache/fluss-rust/issues/413
[2]&nbsp;https://github.com/apache/fluss-rust/issues/356#issuecomment-3981656802

Best&nbsp;regards
Keith&nbsp;Lee

Reply via email to