+1 for the API design

Best,
Leonard

> On 2025 Jul 28, at 13:46, yuxia <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi, all.
> Since this FIP has been pending for a while and not receive any more 
> comments. If still no further comments, I'll start to vote tomorrow.
> 
> Best regards,
> Yuxia
> 
> ----- 原始邮件 -----
> 发件人: "wang junbo" <[email protected]>
> 收件人: "dev" <[email protected]>
> 发送时间: 星期二, 2025年 7 月 22日 下午 6:16:58
> 主题: [SPAM]Re: [DISCUSS] FIP-6: Decouple Flink union read with paimon
> 
> +1
> Reviewed the existing Paimon union read code and the poc branch
> <https://github.com/luoyuxia/fluss/tree/union-read-abstract> code, and
> looking forward to the implementation of union read decoupling from Paimon.I
> hope to contribute to its optimization and plan to write a blog to help
> others understand it better.
> 
> 
> 
> yuxia <[email protected]> 于2025年7月18日周五 15:29写道:
> 
>> Currently, Flink's capability to unon read data in datalake and Fluss is
>> tightly coupled with Paimon's implementation, which limits it's flexibility
>> and extensibility. We hard code paimon related classes in fluss-flink
>> module. It makes it difficult for Flink to support union read other
>> datalakes and for other compute engines like spark, trino to integate with
>> the union read ability. What's more, the tight coupling also obscures the
>> core logic of union read , making the code harder to maintain and evolve.
>> 
>> To address this , I’d like to propose FIP-6: Decouple Flink union read
>> with paimon[1], which seeks to decouple union read from Paimon by
>> introuding well-defiend interfaces and extension points which paimon should
>> implement. By doing so, Flink can support a wider range of datalakes.
>> Furthermore, the standardized interfaces will allow other compute engines
>> to integrate with Fluss's union read capability.
>> 
>> Welcome your feedback and suggestions on this proposal. Looking forward to
>> a productive discussion!
>> 
>> [1]:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUSS/FIP-6%3A+Decouple+Flink+union+read+with+paimon
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Yuxia
>> 

Reply via email to