> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 3:25 PM
> To: Kozak, KubaX <kubax.ko...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.j...@intel.com>; Jastrzebski,
> MichalX K <michalx.k.jastrzeb...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/e1000: fix out of bounds access
>
> Hi Kuba,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kozak, KubaX
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:19 AM
> > To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.j...@intel.com>; Jastrzebski,
> > MichalX K <michalx.k.jastrzeb...@intel.com>; Kozak, KubaX
> > <kubax.ko...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [PATCH] net/e1000: fix out of bounds access
> >
> > Fix wrong structure type used as argument in memset() call.
> >
> > Coverity issue: 147223
> > Coverity issue: 147227
> I'm not sure what's this "coverity issue" mean. Maybe we can remove it?
Hi Wenzhuo,
these are Coverity issue ID numbers - as this is an issue reported by
The Coverity Scan tool (a tool for static code analysis).
So the line " Coverity issue: 147223" means this patch will fix a defect
reported by
The Coverity Scan tool under the number 147223.
Best regards
Michal.
> Except that, Acked-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo...@intel.com>
>
> > Fixes: a8600af43738 ("net/igb: parse flow API ethertype filter")
> > Fixes: 22bb13410cb2 ("net/igb: create consistent filter")
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kuba Kozak <kubax.ko...@intel.com>
