? 2016/11/1 18:46, Ferruh Yigit ??:
> Hi Haifeng,
>
> On 10/31/2016 3:52 AM, linhaifeng wrote:
>> From: Haifeng Lin <haifeng.lin at huawei.com>
>>
>> if rx vlan offload is enable we should not handle vlan slow
>> packets too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Haifeng Lin <haifeng.lin at huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
>> b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
>> index 09ce7bf..ca17898 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
>> @@ -169,7 +169,8 @@ bond_ethdev_rx_burst_8023ad(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf
>> **bufs,
>> /* Remove packet from array if it is slow packet or
>> slave is not
>> * in collecting state or bondign interface is not in
>> promiscus
>> * mode and packet address does not match. */
>> - if (unlikely(hdr->ether_type == ether_type_slow_be ||
>> + if (unlikely((hdr->ether_type == ether_type_slow_be &&
>> + !bufs[j]->vlan_tci) ||
>> !collecting || (!promisc &&
>> !is_multicast_ether_addr(&hdr->d_addr)
>> &&
>> !is_same_ether_addr(&bond_mac,
>> &hdr->d_addr)))) {
>>
>
> There are a few version of this patch, I guess this one is the correct
> one, can you please confirm?
> Also this one supersede following one, right?
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/16840/
yes?this is
>
> It helps a lot if you use versioning in the patches [PATCH -vN] and add
> a description of changes in commit log (after "---") between patch versions.
>
ok?i think should not send patch so worry??
I have a question to ask?
Is there any other packets' type also is 0x8809 except with lacp packets?
I saw some guests try to use this type to check link status between VM
but droped by lacp bond recv function.
> Thanks,
> ferruh
>
> .
>
