On Fri, 23 Oct 2026 at 16:37, Burakov, Anatoly
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 10/23/2026 4:15 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Oct 2026 at 15:51, Anatoly Burakov <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> The event FD and epoll event arrays are copied using the number of
> >> entries as a byte count, so only a fraction of the entries make it
> >> into the duplicate.
> >>
> >> Copy the arrays by element size.
> >>
> >> Fixes: b7c984291611 ("interrupts: add allocator and accessors")
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <[email protected]>
> >
> > Thanks for working on those issues on such short notice.
> >
> > I already put a series for fixing a number of issues with interrupts.
> > As part of it, I would remove the whole duplication principle.
> >
> > Could you perhaps test your series on top of mine?
> >
> > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=39749
> >
> >
>
> It seems that your patchset makes most of mine obsolete, as only 3
> commits survived the rebase (incidentally, the ones I had in v2), and
> the conflicts were trivial enough to resolve on apply IMO. If you like I

Indeed.

> can rebase my patchset on top of yours so that you may include it in
> yours and take over?

I don't mind taking over.
We just need to agree on my comment on the last patch.

The other two fixes lgtm.


-- 
David Marchand

Reply via email to