On Tue, 15 Sep 2026 09:58:46 +0000 Evgeny Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Sokolov Evgeny <[email protected]> > > --- > lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c > index 55ea8fe808..b040f9fa84 100644 > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c > @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ rte_eth_dev_get_name_by_port(uint16_t port_id, char *name) > tmp = eth_dev_shared_data->data[port_id].name; > rte_spinlock_unlock(rte_mcfg_ethdev_get_lock()); > > - strcpy(name, tmp); > + strncpy(name, tmp, RTE_ETH_NAME_MAX_LEN); > > rte_ethdev_trace_get_name_by_port(port_id, name); > This has already been addressed for 26.11 by https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/[email protected]/
