On Mon, 14 Sept 2026 at 12:19, Loftus, Ciara <[email protected]> wrote:
> > @@ -3428,6 +3428,14 @@ iavf_post_reset_reconfig(struct rte_eth_dev
> > *dev)
> >       int ret = 0;
> >       bool allmulti = false, allunicast = false;
> >       struct iavf_adapter *adapter = IAVF_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_ADAPTER(dev-
> > >data->dev_private);
> > +     struct iavf_info *vf = IAVF_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_VF(dev->data-
> > >dev_private);
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * After a VF reset, all MAC addresses got flushed.
> > +      * The primary MAC should have been set in iavf_dev_start, restore
>
> iavf_dev_start is not guaranteed to have been executed before this handler.
> So I would change this comment to something like:
> "The primary MAC has been or will be restored by iavf_dev_start".
>
> Other than that:
>
> Acked-by: Ciara Loftus <[email protected]>

Yes, true.
I'll update in a new revision if needed, otherwise, could it be
updated when applying?


-- 
David Marchand

Reply via email to