17/06/2026 13:48, Morten Brørup: > > From: Huisong Li [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, 17 June 2026 12.28 > > > > Add the RTE_LCORE_ prefix to the lcore role enum values in > > rte_lcore_role_t > > to follow DPDK naming conventions. > > > > - ROLE_RTE -> RTE_LCORE_ROLE_RTE > > - ROLE_OFF -> RTE_LCORE_ROLE_OFF > > - ROLE_SERVICE -> RTE_LCORE_ROLE_SERVICE > > - ROLE_NON_EAL -> RTE_LCORE_ROLE_NON_EAL > > > > Old names are kept as macros aliasing to the new names to preserve > > backward compatibility. > > > > Series-Acked-by: Morten Brørup <[email protected]>
Squashed and applied, thanks. I have a doubt about RTE_LCORE_ROLE_RTE: could we find a better name? Also we should probably add some comments to explain each role.
