On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 03:02:54PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2026 at 18:14, Bruce Richardson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Fix the test_debug unit test on FreeBSD by:
> > * passing no-telemetry to the additional process calls
> > * ensuring that we always use the no-huge and no-shconf params
> > * removing the dependency on procfs to get the exe and using argv[0]
> > instead
> >
> > Bugzilla ID: 761 (partial fix)
> > Fixes: 764bf26873b9 ("add FreeBSD support")
> > Cc: [email protected]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > app/test/process.h | 11 ++++++++---
> > app/test/test_debug.c | 6 +++---
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/process.h b/app/test/process.h
> > index df43966a2a..46b69ce330 100644
> > --- a/app/test/process.h
> > +++ b/app/test/process.h
> > @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ process_dup(const char *const argv[], int numargs, const
> > char *env_value)
> > int driver_path_num;
> > int argv_num;
> > int i, status;
> > - char path[32];
> > + char *path;
> > #ifdef RTE_LIB_PDUMP
> > #ifdef RTE_NET_RING
> > rte_thread_t thread;
> > @@ -188,8 +188,13 @@ process_dup(const char *const argv[], int numargs,
> > const char *env_value)
> > /* set the environment variable */
> > if (setenv(RECURSIVE_ENV_VAR, env_value, 1) != 0)
> > rte_panic("Cannot export environment variable\n");
> > -
> > - strlcpy(path, "/proc/" self "/" exe, sizeof(path));
> > +#ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUX
> > + char path_buf[32];
> > + strlcpy(path_buf, "/proc/" self "/" exe, sizeof(path_buf));
> > + path = path_buf;
> > +#else
> > + path = argv_cpy[0];
> > +#endif
>
> You can remove the self and exe macros that makes no sense anymore
> (the only left users are Linux only).
>
>
> > if (execv(path, argv_cpy) < 0) {
>
> IIRC, all callers pass an array with args[0] == prgname == original
> argv[0] from main.
>
> To convince myself, I ran unit tests in GHA with a dumb change:
> diff --git a/app/test/process.h b/app/test/process.h
> index df43966a2a..c9205992d2 100644
> --- a/app/test/process.h
> +++ b/app/test/process.h
> @@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ process_dup(const char *const argv[], int numargs,
> const char *env_value)
> #endif
> #endif
>
> + if (argv[0] != prgname)
> + return -1;
> +
> pid_t pid = fork();
> if (pid < 0)
> return -1;
>
> So it seems that we can remove this whole exe path discovery and just
> pass argv_cpy[0].
>
>
> > if (errno == ENOENT) {
> > printf("Could not find '%s', is procfs
> > mounted?\n",
>
> Mention of procfs makes no sense for FreeBSD.
>
>
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_debug.c b/app/test/test_debug.c
> > index bfda4d1aa3..eda9c3e0e1 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_debug.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_debug.c
> > @@ -154,15 +154,15 @@ test_debug(void)
> > test_args[2] = "-l";
> > test_args[3] = core;
> >
> > - if (rte_eal_has_hugepages()) {
> > + if (rte_eal_has_hugepages() && RTE_EXEC_ENV_IS_LINUX) {
>
> I miss the reason.
> Why can't we run with hugepages on FreeBSD?
>
Because only one process can use them right now, so spawning a second will
fail. It's a major limitation we need to fix...
