On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 2:08 PM Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's a bit strange to read, > because a crypto test can be functional or performance. > I suppose we can re-discuss the classification of the tests. > If the only need here is about the traffic generator, > we could make it "raw input" or something like that? > I agree that "crypto" is not exactly a true description of the purpose for this test type. It is probably better for the test type to explicitly describe it's purpose. maybe NO_GEN/NO_GENERATOR or NO_TG. It just so happens with this series that crypto tests are the only cases with this type, which was the cause for the initial name but should change in the future. Furthermore, we could divide this into performance and functional versions of this flag.
