On 2/16/2026 6:23 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 10:26:29AM +0000, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
Currently, parser deinitialization will trigger removal of current RSS
configuration. This should not be done as part of parser deinitialization,
but should rather be a separate step in dev close flow.

Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c |  4 ++++
  drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_hash.c   | 13 +++++++++----
  drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_hash.h   | 13 +++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_hash.h

diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c 
b/drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c
index 802e095174..70eb7e7ec5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
  #include "iavf_generic_flow.h"
  #include "rte_pmd_iavf.h"
  #include "iavf_ipsec_crypto.h"
+#include "iavf_hash.h"
/* devargs */
  #define IAVF_PROTO_XTR_ARG         "proto_xtr"
@@ -2972,6 +2973,9 @@ iavf_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
        /* free iAVF security device context all related resources */
        iavf_security_ctx_destroy(adapter);
+ /* remove RSS configuration */
+       iavf_hash_uninit(adapter);
+
        iavf_flow_flush(dev, NULL);
        iavf_flow_uninit(adapter);
diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_hash.c b/drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_hash.c
index a40fed7542..d864998402 100644
--- a/drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_hash.c
+++ b/drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_hash.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
  #include "iavf_log.h"
  #include "iavf.h"
  #include "iavf_generic_flow.h"
+#include "iavf_hash.h"
#define IAVF_PHINT_NONE 0
  #define IAVF_PHINT_GTPU                               BIT_ULL(0)
@@ -77,7 +78,7 @@ static int
  iavf_hash_destroy(struct iavf_adapter *ad, struct rte_flow *flow,
                  struct rte_flow_error *error);
  static void
-iavf_hash_uninit(struct iavf_adapter *ad);
+iavf_hash_uninit_parser(struct iavf_adapter *ad);
  static void
  iavf_hash_free(struct rte_flow *flow);
  static int
@@ -680,7 +681,7 @@ static struct iavf_flow_engine iavf_hash_engine = {
        .init = iavf_hash_init,
        .create = iavf_hash_create,
        .destroy = iavf_hash_destroy,
-       .uninit = iavf_hash_uninit,
+       .uninit = iavf_hash_uninit_parser,
        .free = iavf_hash_free,
        .type = IAVF_FLOW_ENGINE_HASH,
  };
@@ -1641,6 +1642,12 @@ iavf_hash_destroy(__rte_unused struct iavf_adapter *ad,
  }
static void
+iavf_hash_uninit_parser(struct iavf_adapter *ad)
+{
+       iavf_unregister_parser(&iavf_hash_parser, ad);
+}
+
+void
  iavf_hash_uninit(struct iavf_adapter *ad)
  {
        struct iavf_info *vf = IAVF_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_VF(ad);
@@ -1658,8 +1665,6 @@ iavf_hash_uninit(struct iavf_adapter *ad)
        rss_conf = &ad->dev_data->dev_conf.rx_adv_conf.rss_conf;
        if (iavf_rss_hash_set(ad, rss_conf->rss_hf, false))
                PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "fail to delete default RSS");
-
-       iavf_unregister_parser(&iavf_hash_parser, ad);
  }
static void
diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_hash.h 
b/drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_hash.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2348f32673
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/intel/iavf/iavf_hash.h
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2025 Intel Corporation
+ */
+
+#ifndef _IAVF_HASH_H_
+#define _IAVF_HASH_H_
+
+#include "iavf.h"
+
+void
+iavf_hash_uninit(struct iavf_adapter *ad);
+
+#endif /* _IAVF_HASH_H_ */
--

While its primarily a matter of taste, do we really need to create a new
header for this? For a single function prototype can it not just go in
iavf.h directly itself?

Either way:
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <[email protected]>


This code is not touched further down the line so yes, I can move it to iavf.h no problem.

--
Thanks,
Anatoly

Reply via email to