On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 13:50:31 +0100 David Marchand <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 at 13:37, David Marchand <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > In case DPDK is started with multiprocess disabled (like in OVS), there > > is no reason to log an error on multiprocess aspects. > > > > Note: the only caller of this helper does not check the return value. > > > > Fixes: c36ce7099c21 ("net/tap: fix to populate FDs in secondary process") > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <[email protected]> > > I chose to simply silence this warning, though I think something is > wrong with the sync mechanism. > Secondary processes should be the one requesting fds, instead of the > primary process broadcasting to all. > > Queued to next-net
