On 9/3/2025 9:28 AM, David Marchand wrote:
The VFIO headers have a number of issues:
- showing to the world a lot of internal considerations,
- defining macros with the VFIO_ namespace (confusing, and a source of
   conflicts with the VFIO official uAPI),
- wrapping around VFIO uAPI in case the kernel headers do not contain the
   expected API (putting the burden on DPDK developers to find the right
   way to detect the presence of a VFIO feature),
- (somehow related to the previous point) supporting old version of the
   Linux kernel while DPDK now requires a v5.4 Linux kernel at least,

This series proposes to cleanup those headers by hiding as much as
possible internal macros and structures, then removing the explicit
inclusion of linux/vfio.h from rte_vfio.h (pushing this inclusion to the
application which may want to do some funny stuff with VFIO and should
already include this header on its own) and finally importing the VFIO
uAPI header from Linux v6.15 for internal consumption by DPDK
components.



I've been working on something like this myself, so it'll be interesting to compare notes! I too found that refactoring VFIO is a nightmare due to how much stuff is exposed to external headers.

--
Thanks,
Anatoly

Reply via email to