> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday 23 June 2025 14:53
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>; Tyler
> Retzlaff <roret...@linux.microsoft.com>; Neil Horman
> <nhor...@tuxdriver.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 07/10] tailq: fix cast macro for null pointer
> 
> Doing arithmetics with the NULL pointer is undefined.
> 
> Caught by UBSan:
> 
> ../app/test/test_tailq.c:111:9: runtime error:
>       member access within null pointer of type 'struct rte_tailq_head'
> 
> Fixes: f6b4f6c9c123 ("tailq: use a single cast macro")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/eal/include/rte_tailq.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_tailq.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_tailq.h
> index 89f7ef2134..c23df77d96 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/include/rte_tailq.h
> +++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_tailq.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct rte_tailq_elem {
>   * Return the first tailq entry cast to the right struct.
>   */
>  #define RTE_TAILQ_CAST(tailq_entry, struct_name) \
> -     (struct struct_name *)&(tailq_entry)->tailq_head
> +     (tailq_entry == NULL ? NULL : (struct struct_name *)&(tailq_entry)-
> >tailq_head)
> 
>  /**
>   * Utility macro to make looking up a tailqueue for a particular struct 
> easier.

First tailq_entry is missing parentheses. Also, it is worrying that we now use 
macro argument twice. E.g. RTE_TAILQ_LOOKUP may become twice slower as a result.

Could we perhaps simplify the macro to `(struct struct_name *)(tailq_entry)`. I 
tried to find or understand the reasons behind the original construction, but 
could not.

Reply via email to