On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 5:14 PM Stephen Hemminger
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:04:15 +0000
> Vladimir Ratnikov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/bus/vmbus/bus_vmbus_driver.h
> > b/drivers/bus/vmbus/bus_vmbus_driver.h
> > index e2475a642d..6b010cbe41 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bus/vmbus/bus_vmbus_driver.h
> > +++ b/drivers/bus/vmbus/bus_vmbus_driver.h
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct rte_vmbus_device {
> > rte_uuid_t device_id; /**< VMBUS device id */
> > rte_uuid_t class_id; /**< VMBUS device type */
> > uint32_t relid; /**< id for primary */
> > + uint16_t device_order; /**< Device order after
> > probing */
> > uint8_t monitor_id; /**< monitor page */
> > int uio_num; /**< UIO device number */
> > uint32_t *int_page; /**< VMBUS interrupt page */
> > diff --git a/drivers/bus/vmbus/vmbus_common.c
> > b/drivers/bus/vmbus/vmbus_common.c
>
> Is this an ABI change?
drivers/bus/vmbus/meson.build:driver_sdk_headers = files('bus_vmbus_driver.h')
Only drivers of this bus know the rte_vmbus_device object.
So this patch does not impact the public ABI.
Yet, I fail to see what this patch is trying to achieve.
--
David Marchand