On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 6:57 PM Hemant Agrawal <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 08-Jan-24 2:01 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:47 PM Hemant Agrawal <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 08-Jan-24 1:28 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >>> From: Jerin Jacob <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> Define qualification criteria for external library > >>> based on a techboard meeting minutes [1] and past > >>> learnings from mailing list discussion. > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-June/135847.html > >>> https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2024-January/284849.html > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <[email protected]> > >>> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> > > > >>> +#. **Distributions License:** > >>> + > >>> + - No specific constraints beyond documentation. > >> > >> Though we are not mandatory open distribution. However we should ask for > >> the > >> defining the distribution aspect clearly in the library. > > > > How about following then, > > > > No specific constraints, but clear documentation on distribution usage > > aspects is required. > > > > If not, please suggest the exact wording. > > I think above is ok.
I will add it next version. > > > >
