> -----Original Message----- > From: Luca Vizzarro <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 8, 2024 6:18 AM > To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]>; Etelson, > Gregory <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Juraj Linkeš > <[email protected]>; Paul Szczepanek <[email protected]>; > Yoan Picchi <[email protected]>; Jeremy Spewock > <[email protected]>; Patrick Robb <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: DTS testpmd and SCAPY integration > > Hi Honnappa, > > > YAML has wide support built around it. By using our own text format, we will > have to build the parsing support etc ourselves. > > > > However, YAML is supposed to be easy to read and understand. Is it just a > matter for getting used to it? > > I may be wrong, please feel free to correct me, but I believe what Gregory > meant is to write raw Scapy and testpmd commands directly in YAML-written > tests. As in, we wouldn't be using our own text format, we'd just need to feed > the raw commands from YAML straight to the Scapy and testpmd shells. > Finally, validate their responses to what was set in the YAML test. In > Gregory's > example this is just comparing stdout. Yes, I have misunderstood Gregory's proposal. I am all for using YAML. Let us discuss more in the DTS meetings and hear what others have to say.
> > Best, > Luca
