> -----Original Message----- > From: Sunyang Wu <sunyang...@jaguarmicro.com> > Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2023 2:00 PM > To: Akhil Goyal <gak...@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Ji, Kai <kai...@intel.com> > Subject: 回复: [EXT] [PATCH 1/2] lib/cryptodev/: Add > SM3_HMAC/SM4_CFB/SM4_OFB support in DPDK > > Hi all: > SM3 and SM4 are widely used in China, and they are Chinese national standards. > I'm very to tell you that I didn't find the relevant RFC documents for SM3 and > SM4, but I found the national standards for SM3 and SM4 in the full text > disclosure system of Chinese national standards, but they are all in Chinese. > The > links are shown below: > SM3: > http://c.gb688.cn/bzgk/gb/showGb?type=online&hcno=45B1A67F20F3BF33921 > 1C391E9278F5E > SM4: > http://c.gb688.cn/bzgk/gb/showGb?type=online&hcno=7803DE42D3BC5E80B0 > C3E5D8E873D56A > If these modes(SM3_HMAC / SM4_OFB / SM4_CFB) are not necessary, I can > resubmit a patch, delete the corresponding test cases for these modes, and > retain only the test cases for the mods currently supported by DPdK. > > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Akhil Goyal <gak...@marvell.com> > 发送时间: 2023年3月16日 18:43 > 收件人: Sunyang Wu <sunyang...@jaguarmicro.com>; dev@dpdk.org > 抄送: kai...@intel.com > 主题: RE: [EXT] [PATCH 1/2] lib/cryptodev/: Add > SM3_HMAC/SM4_CFB/SM4_OFB support in DPDK > > > Add SM3_HMAC/SM4_CFB/SM4_OFB support in DPDK. > > > > Can you give reference to some documentation for each of these modes. > Cannot find RFCs for SM3_HMAC etc.
HMAC is supposed to work with any iterated hash function. Since we already have SM3 in the API, I would not worry about lack of RFC for specific SM3 + HMAC combination. > > > Signed-off-by: Sunyang Wu <sunyang...@jaguarmicro.com> > > --- > > lib/cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h | 8 +++++++- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
