Is there any validation to this changes ? I Can't remember the exact reason why EEXIST returned, somehow we need to handle that case.
Regards Kai > -----Original Message----- > From: Akhil Goyal <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, February 27, 2023 6:27 PM > To: Karas, Krzysztof <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon > <[email protected]>; Ji, Kai <[email protected]>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo > <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH] ipsec_mb: expect ENOTSUP in ipsec_mb_create() > > > Subject: [EXT] [PATCH] ipsec_mb: expect ENOTSUP in ipsec_mb_create() > > Title should start with crypto/ipsec_mb: > Avoid using function names in patch titles. > > > > > Commit b35848bc01f6 ("crypto/ipsec_mb: add multi-process IPC request > > handler") is part of DPDK 22.11 release and it enforces usage of > > shared config and multiprocess mode. > > > > DPDK is not required to be run with more than one process in general, > > so instead of erroring out, catch the error and proceed with ipsec_mb > > device creation normally. > > This seems to be a fix, kindly adhere to the guidelines for fixes patches. > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Karas <[email protected]> > > > Kai/Pablo, > Acks please? >
