On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:56:29 +0000 "Kearney, Tadhg" <tadhg.kear...@intel.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> > > Sent: Monday 11 July 2022 17:37 > > To: Kearney, Tadhg <tadhg.kear...@intel.com> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; dave.h...@intel.com; Burakov, Anatoly > > <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>; Pattan, Reshma <reshma.pat...@intel.com> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] power: add uncore api to power library > > > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:22:57 +0000 > > tadhgkearney <tadhg.kear...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > + FILE *f_cur_min; /**< FD of scaling_min */ > > > + FILE *f_cur_max; /**< FD of scaling_max */ > > > + FILE *f_base_min; /**< FD of initial min */ > > > + FILE *f_base_max; /**< FD of initial max */ > > > > Do you need to hold these extra FD's open? > > Also wasteful to use stdio for simple control sysfs like this. > > Hi Stephen, > No these extra FD's don't need to be kept open, will remove their usage for > v3. > What do you mean exactly by using stdio; are you suggesting to not make use > of flush() calls, > or more broadly avoid stdio altogether? > Thanks, > Tadhg See eal_parse_sysfs_value.