在 2021/10/27 21:47, David Marchand 写道:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 5:21 AM Min Hu (Connor) <humi...@huawei.com> wrote:
Hi, David,
In function "bond_ethdev_promiscuous_disable",
for "ROUND ROBIN","BALANCE","BROADCAST","8023AD" mode, Promiscuous mode
is propagated to all slaves.
While for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", "TLB", "ALB", promiscuous mode is propagated
only to primary slave.
Why?
From what I remember of the rework I did some time ago, the code was
already doing it and I did not question it.
I guess it mimicks what the Linux kernel bonding driver does.
The second question, for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", when primary active slave
fails, a different slave becomes active, does the promiscuous mode state
of former primary should be set to the new primary?
IOW, setting promisc on the link that becomes primary?
If it is not done, it sounds like a bug.
OK, I will try to fix it, thanks David.
