On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 5:55 PM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: > > 24/03/2021 11:32, David Marchand: > > Add a log message when registering log types and changing log levels. > [...] > > + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "%s logtype level changed from %s to > > %s\n", > > I would prefer "foo log level changed" > instead of "foo logtype level changed". > Opinions?
No objection for me. > > > + rte_logs.dynamic_types[type].name == NULL ? > > + "" : rte_logs.dynamic_types[type].name, > > In which case the logtype name is undefined? The logtype name is strdup(). When registering static logtypes, this could fail, and we log the level change at this point. The other path would be to call rte_log_set_level() on those static logtypes (there is also the case of the holes in the static logtypes, but if users are using them, it sounds like a hack). > If it is unexexpected, should we have "unknown" instead of ""? We could still register a "unknown" logtype, and then it would be odd :-). Empty is clear to me. -- David Marchand
