On 9/25/2020 10:07 AM, Igor Russkikh wrote:
When testing high performance numbers, it is often that CPU performance
limits the max values device can reach (both in pps and in gbps)
Here instead of recreating each packet separately, we use clones counter
to resend the same mbuf to the line multiple times.
Do you have any numbers on how much performance improvement gained?
PMDs handle that transparently due to reference counting inside of mbuf.
Verified on Marvell qede and atlantic PMDs.
v2: increment ref counter for each mbuf pointer copy
Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <irussk...@marvell.com>
<...>
@@ -1151,6 +1153,16 @@ launch_args_parse(int argc, char** argv)
else
nb_pkt_per_burst = (uint16_t) n;
}
+ if (!strcmp(lgopts[opt_idx].name, "clones")) {
+ n = atoi(optarg);
+ if ((n >= 0) &&
+ (n <= nb_pkt_per_burst))
+ nb_pkt_clones = (uint16_t) n;
+ else
+ rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
+ "clones must be >= 0 and <= %d
(burst)\n",
+ nb_pkt_per_burst);
Do you need to enforce the "n <= nb_pkt_per_burst", burst value can be changed
later and trying to keep 'clones' values in sync with it is additional work.
In the flowgen logic, with each burst a new packet is created anyway. So instead
of enforcing the 'clones' number range, in documentation you can say the clone
number can't exceed the burst number whatever it is set.
+ }
if (!strcmp(lgopts[opt_idx].name, "mbcache")) {
n = atoi(optarg);
if ((n >= 0) &&
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
index fe6450cc0..18b4b63d1 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
@@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ uint32_t tx_pkt_times_intra;
/**< Timings for send scheduling in TXONLY mode, time between packets. */
uint16_t nb_pkt_per_burst = DEF_PKT_BURST; /**< Number of packets per burst. */
+uint16_t nb_pkt_clones; /**< Number of tx packet clones to send. */
uint16_t mb_mempool_cache = DEF_MBUF_CACHE; /**< Size of mbuf mempool cache.
*/
Both the parameter name, 'clones', and the variable name 'nb_pkt_clones' are too
generic, and may mislead users. Please remember that testpms usage is very wide.
You are updating very specifically the flowgen forwarding engine, can you please
prefix the 'flowgen', like:
'flowgen-clones' & 'nb_pkt_flowgen_clones'.
Also explicitly mention in the description that this is for flowgen clones.
<...>
