On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:28 AM Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]> wrote: > > The existing definition of rte_epoll_wait retries if interrupted > by a signal. This behavior makes it hard to use rte_epoll_wait > for applications that want to use signals do do things like > exit polling loop and shutdown. > > Since changing existing semantic might break applications, add > a new rte_epoll_wait_interruptible() function that does the > same thing as rte_epoll_wait but will return -1 and errno of EINTR > if it receives a signal. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Harman Kalra <[email protected]>
You will certainly argue that the existing function had no unit test but we want to fix this at some point. Can a unit test be added? Thanks. -- David Marchand
