+Ruifeng > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 10:34 AM > To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Phil > Yang <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Using C11 atomic semantic > > In the techboard of April 22, it has been decided to block patches using > rte_atomicNN_xx and rte_smp_*mb APIs, starting DPDK 20.08. > Meeting minutes: > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-April/165143.html > Deprecation notice: > http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.html > > Some doc has been submitted to help understanding how to manage atomics: > http://doc > .dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/writing_efficient_code.html#locks-and- > atomic-operations > > Unfortunately the tool to check new code was merged last week: > http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=f1602b4a86 > > As a consequence, I propose to apply the "reject rule" starting DPDK 20.11. As far as I know no patch with rte_atomic has gone in 20.08 so far. Are there any patches in RC2/RC3 that need rte_atomic APIs?
> > Can we make this rule better advertised with an announce message? Do you mean an email on dpdk-announce mailing list? > Are the current technical explanations enough? The documentation patch you referenced above covers most common cases people will encounter. Even the rte_ring/rte_stack algorithms work on the same principles. > If not, it would be wonderful to have a blog post explaining the details, as > part of an announce. This is in the works. The plan is to send it to you soon and get it out along with the release. >
