> -----Original Message----- > From: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> > Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 10:00 PM > To: Joyce Kong <joyce.k...@arm.com> > Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>; jer...@marvell.com; > Zhihong Wang <zhihong.w...@intel.com>; Xiaolong Ye > <xiaolong...@intel.com>; Beilei Xing <beilei.x...@intel.com>; Jeff Guo > <jia....@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Matan > Azrad <ma...@mellanox.com>; Shahaf Shuler <shah...@mellanox.com>; > Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viachesl...@mellanox.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli > <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; Phil Yang <phil.y...@arm.com>; > Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>; dev <dev@dpdk.org>; nd > <n...@arm.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] net/i40e: replace restrict with rte > restrict > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 9:50 AM Joyce Kong <joyce.k...@arm.com> wrote: > > > > '__rte_restrict' is a common wrapper for restricted pointers which can > > be supported by all compilers. Use '__rte_restrict' instead of > > '__restrict' for code consistency. > > This patch 4, 5 and 6 are simple replacements and can be squashed into the > first patch. > > Thanks. > The first patch is to add a common definition for lib_eal, could we squash the 4,5 and 6 into one replacement patch, while separate them from the first one? This might be more convenient for review?
> -- > David Marchand
