On 10/24/2019 8:44 AM, Somnath Kotur wrote: > @@ -32523,7 +33886,7 @@ > > struct hwrm_nvm_write_input { > > * The requested length of the allocated NVM for the item, in bytes. This > value may be greater than or equal to the specified data length > (dir_data_length). > * If this value is less than the specified data length, it will be ignored. > * The response will contain the actual allocated item length, which may be > greater than the requested item length. > - * The purpose for allocating more than the required number of bytes for an > item's data is to pre-allocate extra storage (padding) to accomodate > + * The purpose for allocating more than the required number of bytes for an > item's data is to pre-allocate extra storage (padding) to accommodate > * the potential future growth of an item (e.g. upgraded firmware with a size > increase, log growth, expanded configuration data). > */ > uint32_t dir_item_length;
We are more flexible on the base files and their compatibility to our coding convention, but for later can it be possible to take the line length under more control. > > @@ -33105,7 +34468,7 @@ > > struct hwrm_nvm_install_update_input { > > #define HWRM_NVM_INSTALL_UPDATE_INPUT_FLAGS_ERASE_UNUSED_SPACE \ > UINT32_C(0x1) > /* > - * If set to 1, then unspecifed images, images not in the package file, will > be safely deleted. > + * If set to 1, then unspecified images, images not in the package file, > will be safely deleted. > * When combined with erase_unused_space then unspecified images will be > securely erased. > */ > #define HWRM_NVM_INSTALL_UPDATE_INPUT_FLAGS_REMOVE_UNUSED_PKG \ > > -- > 2.10.1.613.g2cc2e70 > > > > >