> -----Original Message----- > From: Eads, Gage <gage.e...@intel.com> > Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2019 3:50 AM > To: Phil Yang (Arm Technology China) <phil.y...@arm.com>; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: nd <n...@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli > <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) > <gavin...@arm.com> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] eal/stack: fix 'pointer-sign' warning > > > clang raise 'pointer-sign' warnings in __atomic_compare_exchange when > > passing 'uint64_t *' to parameter of type 'int64_t *' converts between > > pointers to integer types with different sign. > > > > Fixes: 7e6e609939a8 ("stack: add C11 atomic implementation") > > > > Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.y...@arm.com> > > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com> > > > > --- > > lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h > > b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h > > index a316e9a..e3b9eff 100644 > > --- a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h > > +++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h > > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ __rte_stack_lf_pop_elems(struct rte_stack_lf_list > *list, > > return NULL; > > #else > > struct rte_stack_lf_head old_head; > > - uint64_t len; > > + int64_t len; > > This works, but I'd prefer to keep 'len' unsigned. How about changing the > definition of 'len' in struct rte_stack_lf_list to uint64_t, and in > rte_stack_lf_generic.h casting it to rte_atomic64_t* when its address is > passed to the rte_atomic64_...() functions?
It is better I think. I have upstreamed the v2, please review it. Thanks, Phil