A regular version release looks to to me.

And I suggest to change the Doris version based on year and month. Such as:
Doris 20.07
Doris 20.11
Just like Ubuntu. So that it is more clear.






--

此致!Best Regards
陈明雨 Mingyu Chen

Email:
chenmin...@apache.org





At 2020-05-09 09:56:56, "Zhao Chun" <zh...@apache.org> wrote:
>I think we need to discuss and agree on the release cadence.
>
>There are two common types of releases: one is a regular release, such as a
>quarterly release; and the other is when certain features are available.
>
>Given that the people in our current community are not necessarily able to
>guarantee the timely delivery of functionality.
>Because Doris is still in a rapid development process, feature improvements
>and bug fixes are still frequent, and if the release cycle drags on too
>long, it will affect the user's use.
>That's why I recommend a regular release.
>
>I propose a draft of our release process.
>
>1. We publish a regular version in January, April, July and October of each
>year.
>2. Cut the release branch one month before the release, and only bug fix
>will be merged the release branch.
>3. Release a RC version every week or two week to help users to test new
>version Doris.
>4. Start formal release process after 1 month.
>
>
>Any discussion on this approach is welcome.
>
>Thanks,
>Zhao Chun
>
>
>陈明雨 <morning...@163.com> 于2020年5月7日周四 上午9:46写道:
>
>> Hi all:
>>
>>
>>
>> I suggest that we discuss the features that need to be implemented in the
>> next release of Doris.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The following are some of the main features that have currently issued
>> proposals:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. Support loading data by Spark (Almost Done) [1]
>>
>> 2. Advanced Materialized View: (Researching and Designing)  [2]
>>
>> 3. Memory tablet that supporting CRUD (Implementing) [3]
>>
>> 4. Vectorized execution engine (Researching and Designing) [4]
>>
>> 5. Nested type support (Array) (Implementing) [5]
>>
>>
>>
>> If there are other main features, please add them.
>> And If there is any need for further discussion in the above features,
>> feel free to discuss.
>>
>>
>> Also, do you have any thoughts on our current release version format?
>> For example, whether to continue to use the version format as 0.xx ?
>> Or is it necessary changed to a version format by Year and Month? Such as
>> 20.6?
>> If the version format of 0.xx is still used, we may need to consider when
>> the 1.0 version will be released.
>>
>>
>> If you have any ideas, please discuss.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/3433
>> [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/3344
>> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/3382
>> [4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/3438
>> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/2871
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> 此致!Best Regards
>> 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
>>
>> Email:
>> chenmin...@apache.org

Reply via email to