A regular version release looks to to me.
And I suggest to change the Doris version based on year and month. Such as: Doris 20.07 Doris 20.11 Just like Ubuntu. So that it is more clear. -- 此致！Best Regards 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen Email: chenmin...@apache.org At 2020-05-09 09:56:56, "Zhao Chun" <zh...@apache.org> wrote: >I think we need to discuss and agree on the release cadence. > >There are two common types of releases: one is a regular release, such as a >quarterly release; and the other is when certain features are available. > >Given that the people in our current community are not necessarily able to >guarantee the timely delivery of functionality. >Because Doris is still in a rapid development process, feature improvements >and bug fixes are still frequent, and if the release cycle drags on too >long, it will affect the user's use. >That's why I recommend a regular release. > >I propose a draft of our release process. > >1. We publish a regular version in January, April, July and October of each >year. >2. Cut the release branch one month before the release, and only bug fix >will be merged the release branch. >3. Release a RC version every week or two week to help users to test new >version Doris. >4. Start formal release process after 1 month. > > >Any discussion on this approach is welcome. > >Thanks, >Zhao Chun > > >陈明雨 <morning...@163.com> 于2020年5月7日周四 上午9:46写道： > >> Hi all: >> >> >> >> I suggest that we discuss the features that need to be implemented in the >> next release of Doris. >> >> >> >> >> The following are some of the main features that have currently issued >> proposals: >> >> >> >> >> 1. Support loading data by Spark (Almost Done) [1] >> >> 2. Advanced Materialized View: (Researching and Designing) [2] >> >> 3. Memory tablet that supporting CRUD (Implementing) [3] >> >> 4. Vectorized execution engine (Researching and Designing) [4] >> >> 5. Nested type support (Array) (Implementing) [5] >> >> >> >> If there are other main features, please add them. >> And If there is any need for further discussion in the above features, >> feel free to discuss. >> >> >> Also, do you have any thoughts on our current release version format? >> For example, whether to continue to use the version format as 0.xx ? >> Or is it necessary changed to a version format by Year and Month? Such as >> 20.6? >> If the version format of 0.xx is still used, we may need to consider when >> the 1.0 version will be released. >> >> >> If you have any ideas, please discuss. >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/3433 >> [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/3344 >> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/3382 >> [4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/3438 >> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/2871 >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> 此致！Best Regards >> 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen >> >> Email: >> chenmin...@apache.org
