On 2019/06/24 15:44:40, Myrle Krantz <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not arguing against asking sponsors to skip us and go to Outreachy.> > But it doesn't actually solve the neutrality problem. Of course it does. > > Neutrality, or lack of it, comes when we pick the winners. As mentioned before, this focus on phrasing/defining "neutrality" that way is incorrect and misses the point completely.
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framewo... Naomi S
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framewo... Sam Ruby
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framewo... Sam Ruby
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framewo... Myrle Krantz
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framewo... Naomi S
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framewo... Sage Sharp
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framewo... Myrle Krantz
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framewo... Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framewo... Myrle Krantz
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framewo... Awasum Yannick
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Jim Jagielski
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Sam Ruby
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Myrle Krantz
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Jim Jagielski
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Jim Jagielski
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Jim Jagielski
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Sage Sharp
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Sam Ruby
- Re: [DISCUSS] Outreachy framework proposal Awasum Yannick
