Right, forgot about that, that will be a good starting point for 2.0.

The concern is that if we have to iterate each browser version with its
attributes, the browser pattern/attribute file will contain hundreds of
entries and be very heavy. So im thinking we will have a lightweight
browser domain and a more heavy and detailed browser domain. Lightweight
will contain the basic patterns for popular browser (chrome, firefox,
safari, ie, etc) and basic attributes, so a few KB, ideal for
web/javascript usage. The heavy version will have all browser patterns and
very detailed browser attributes. Could still be used on web, but it will
have larger overhead.

Volkan, I have reviewed your commits, great job!!! Thanks for adding these
devices!!!

On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote:

> It (list of browsers) always was there:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/devicemap/trunk/data/1.0/device-data/src/main/resources/devicedata/BrowserDataSource.xml?view=markup
> Just not using it (by most clients;-)
>
> Werner
>
> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Reza Naghibi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Where do you see a list of browsers???
> >
> >
> >
> > <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Volkan Yazıcı <
> > [email protected]> </div><div>Date:05/02/2015  4:54 PM
> (GMT-05:00)
> > </div><div>To: [email protected] </div><div>Cc:
> > </div><div>Subject: Google Chrome </div><div>
> > </div>Hi,
> >
> > Shouldn't we have a Google Chrome in the list of browsers?
> > Am I missing something obvious?
> >
> > Best.
> >
>

Reply via email to