Thank you very much. :)
> Subject: Re: Can clustering be setup between nodes that only accept SSL
> connections?
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 12:39:50 +0100
> To: [email protected]
>
> A fully encrypted demo is on my TODO list, hopefully will get to it this week.
>
> B.
>
> > On 25 Aug 2016, at 11:15, Joey Samonte <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > We are currently using nginx sir as reverse proxy in front of CouchDB
> >
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: Can clustering be setup between nodes that only accept SSL
> >> connections?
> >> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:07:29 +0100
> >> To: [email protected]
> >>
> >> Yes, couchdb can be configured that way but my recommendation is to put
> >> something like haproxy in front instead. The native ssl support in Erlang
> >> has a buggy history in my experience, though I believe 18.x is working
> >> quite nicely. Further, with couchdb 2.0, you'll want a round-robin loss
> >> balancer in front of them to fully enjoy the clustered fault tolerance.
> >>
> >> For < 2.0, you just need to configure the httpsd daemon and comment out
> >> the httpsd one. For 2.0, I'll have to research a little as I'm not sure
> >> the chttpd service is as rainy disabled.
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >>> On 24 Aug 2016, at 21:08, Joey Samonte <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Good day,
> >>>
> >>> SSL is a must for us to secure our data. Can the CouchDB nodes in the
> >>> cluster only allow https, for example, on port 6984?
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
