Just one point from me. The distributed goop in Erlang is pretty much just for the everyone-connected-to-everyone-else old school cluster model. I don't think it's useful for the kind of scale I associate with CouchDB at all.
B. On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Randall Leeds <[email protected]> wrote: > There is no reason I see why HTTP is not a valid transport for a DHT nor any > reason why it is not possible to gossip over HTTP. I think it's confusing > the issue to blame HTTP for any problem Couch has with distribution. > > Enlighten me if I'm wrong, of course. > > On Aug 16, 2010 1:19 PM, "Jan Lehnardt" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 16 Aug 2010, at 22:11, Noah Slater wrote: > >> >> On 16 Aug 2010, at 20:52, Miles Fidelman wrote: > ... > I'd like to add that Miles does have a point, but we have good reasons to > have HTTP for now and in the future. It doesn't mean that applying > specializations where applicable is not an option (double negative :). > > Cheers > Jan > -- >
