Hi Elliotte,

On 25.04.2026 16:43, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> That doesn't address my concern. In fact, quite the opposite.
> Maintenance is exactly where Apache projects fail over time. There's
> usually an initial surge of interest. However as the years pass
> developers move on, corporate priorities change, and code rots.
> Projects have long lists of ghost PMC members and committers. but you
> can't get even one person to review a PR, much less release.  This has
> happened to too many projects to count. Xerces, Xalan, and pretty much
> all of Apache Commons currently sit on the efforts of approximately
> one developer each, and one developer is insufficient for current
> maintenance, much less future maintenance.


I do share your concern, since the situation, especially in the
XML-related PMCs, is dire. However, here I am not looking for a TLP,
just an additional library in the Commons collection. Since this one
starts anew, and it will have a rapid release cycle at the beginning, it
would make sense to have a separate release cycle.

In Log4j we use this strategy: initially users publish their own
third-party artifacts. If these become popular enough, we consider them
for inclusion in Log4j. For XML Factory I am happy to take the same route.

Piotr

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to