Hello. Le lun. 25 oct. 2021 à 18:09, Alex Herbert <alex.d.herb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Many of the issues within [statistics] have now been resolved. There > are some remaining issues that are linked to the gamma functions in > [numbers]:
Thanks for these accuracy and performance enhancements. > [...] > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STATISTICS-38 > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STATISTICS-39 > [3] > https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_77_0/libs/math/doc/html/math_toolkit/sf_gamma/igamma.html > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-171 > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-172 > There is also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-167 that definitely should entail a performance gain not achievable with the current API (a single "static" function). As discussed in the comments, it seems that the required functionality would kludge the existing class(es); so I wondered whether we should keep those untouched (except for improving the implementation) and provide an alternative API in new (factory) classes that would call and cache the low-level "static" functions. Regards, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
