On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello, > > > Am 11.07.2017 um 06:55 schrieb Simon Spero <sesunc...@gmail.com>: > > > > Since it's an interface, I could change it to IHasACharset? > > > > Or If you prefer I could rename it to YouGiveLove? (Lucky Millenials- > you > > aren't headsonged) > > I recommend to leave this kind of irony out of mailing list communication. > This is probably your personal style of communicating, but it is hard to > understand in remote communication with people from other cultural > backgrounds. It makes communication more boring to remove this kind of > sugar, but it helps to avoid misunderstandings. > I suppose Slack would work... G > > Cheers, > Benedikt > > > > > The name follows a pattern for interfaces of this sort, which are > basically > > retrofit markers for the presence of property, (with associated getters). > > I've seen it used in other projects, but it might be bleed through from > > some OWL / RDF patterns. > > > > I'm not in love with the pattern but it required the least thought :) > > > > (java 8 makes this sort of interface moot, as the accessor can be added > as > > a default method. It is even be a candidate for the proper use of > Optional. > > ) > > > > On Jul 5, 2017 1:14 PM, "Gary Gregory" <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > The new interface name HasCharset is pretty bad IMO. > > > > CharsetProvider is the obvious (to me) better name even though there > > already is a class called java.nio.charset.spi.CharsetProvider. > > > > Alternatives could be CharsetContainer, CharsetAccessor, CharsetGetter, ? > > > > Gary > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
