> On May 24, 2017, at 11:11 AM, Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote:
>
> On 24 May 2017 at 15:55, Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We should simply add that entry, "commons.automatic-module-name," to every
>> component pom’s properties section now, and then when the next parent
>> migration happens, the changes will express naturally. It might be worth
>> adding a comment on the property in each pom?
>>
>> I’d be happy to do that between now and Monday.
>
> As I said upthread, there is an argument to only add it to components
> once they have been checked to see if they are valid for use as a
> module.
Right.
>
> That said, I'm willing to go with it as an approach because AFAICT if
> a component isn't a good modular citizen, the Automatic-Module-Name
> MANIFEST entry won't do much harm.
Yes.
>
> Of course, strictly speaking we don't know if Automatic-Module-Name
> will be part of the final JDK 9, as private discussions are currently
> ongoing between the key players. Since it will cause no harm if
> wrongly present, I'm OK with this too,
>
> If you are going to do it, I'd suggest using ${commons.module-name},
Makes sense to me there. I’m not the best at coming up with names. :-)
> as you will be adding the official module name for the component. That
> it is only used as the automatic module name right now is a detail.
I will start chipping away at this tomorrow or Friday, assuming that there
aren’t any objections between now and then.
-Rob
>
> Stephen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
