Suggested text: > Sign and submit the Apache Contributor License Agreement if you haven't > already. Note that small patches & bug-fixes do not require a CLA as they are > covered by Apache License clause 5.
On 29 June 2016 at 16:59, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > https://github.com/apache/commons-collections/blob/trunk/CONTRIBUTING.md#submitting-changes > says > > >> Sign the Contributor License Agreement if you haven't already. >> Push your changes to a topic branch in your fork of the repository. >> Submit a pull request to the repository in the apache organization. > > However I don't think we should require a CLA for small patches - this > is not an ASF requirement as such patches would still be covered by > the Apache License. We should still require an ICLA for new additions > and anything that looks "large" or "clever". > > This was mentioned in http://apetro.ghost.io/apache-contributors-no-cla/ > and > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d29ad962938540f2f2b5cc70e7f0b3d3ec347fc5c619a6498a141fdc@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E > > > Am I OK to update that README to clarify that ICLA is not always > needed, or do we have such a policy of always requiring ICLA within > Apache Commons? > > > We should also update https://commons.apache.org/patches.html > to describe Pull Requests and ICLAs. > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org