Le 2014-10-14 15:16, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
Should I try an experiment with that with those interpolator changes I
put
the diff into JIRA for and remove that flle from the JIRA issue or is
the
process of using that diff already underway so it would create more
brain
daamge than it was worth?
I think you can try your experiment. Just add a notice to JIRA that you
are working
on further improvements and they will soon becomre outdated rather than
removing them.
Luc
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:12 AM, luc <l...@spaceroots.org> wrote:
Hi Hank,
Le 2014-10-14 15:01, Gilles a écrit :
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:36:07 -0400, Hank Grabowski wrote:
It seems that the GitHub repository is now staying in sync with the
ASF
repository. Is the preferred workflow going to be (or already is)
forking
inside of GitHub and then doing pull requests or will the workflow
be to
work directly with ASF? For someone like me with only read only
access
to
the ASF it seems that the fork method is better than submitting diff
files
attached to JIRA incidents.
[Non authoritative answer; I'm still far from up to speed with
git...]
I think that all three ways are fine; it's your choice.
Yes, you can do as you want.
As [math] is expereimenting here, the processe is not fully defined.
What *is* fully defined however is that the mailing list is the place
of
choice for discussing changes.
Once discussion has settled, I think we can grab patches from almost
anyware.
best regards,
Luc
Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org