So is this a +0, +1, abstain...?

Thanks,
Matt

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Oliver Heger
<oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
> Build works fine with Java 1.7 on Windows 8.1. Artifacts look good.
>
> The site does a good job in explaining basic principles, but it is
> missing some concrete examples how proxy objects can be created and
> used. But this is not a blocker for the release.
>
> What I am missing is some specific information about backwards
> compatibility. This is version 2.0, so are there breaking changes? What
> am I supposed to do when migrating from 1.0?
>
> I would at least expect some hints in the release notes. Ideally, there
> would be a migration guide; but this could be added later.
>
> Oliver
>
> Am 07.04.2014 21:50, schrieb Matt Benson:
>> I would like to release Commons Proxy 2.0.
>>
>>   Commons Proxy 2.0 RC1 is available for review here:
>>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/proxy/ (svn revision 4960)
>>
>>   Maven artifacts are here:
>>     https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1022
>>
>>   Details of changes since 1.0 are in the release notes:
>>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/proxy/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>>     
>> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-proxy-2.0-rc1/changes-report.html
>>
>>   I have tested this with JDKs 1.6, 1.7, and 1.8 using Apache Maven .
>>
>>   The tag is here:
>>     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/proxy/tags/2.0_RC1/
>> (r1585560)
>>
>>   Site:
>>     http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-proxy-2.0-rc1/index.html
>>   (note some *relative* links may be broken - these will be OK once
>> the site is deployed)
>>
>>   RAT Report:
>>     http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-proxy-2.0-rc1/rat-report.html
>>
>>   KEYS:
>>   http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>>
>>   Please review the release candidate and vote.
>>   This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now, i.e. after
>> 2000 GMT 10-April 2014
>>
>>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>
>>   Thanks!
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to