On 04/09/2014 07:37 AM, Cyrille Artho wrote: > Hi Thomas, > Thank you for your quick response. We ran our tool again on version 4 > and still had (different) failed tests. However, most failures are > pointing to the same problem, so we will probably only have very few bug > reports after our triage. The triage will take a while so I will get > back to you when it's done.
sounds good, but there is no need to contact me personally. Everything related to collections can and should be discussed on the dev mailing list. > So far, there seem to be two issues: > > * Some contracts are documented but not enforced as (for example) an > IllegalStateException. This is under "nice to have" and not so urgent. A > "nice" solution would result in a very small performance hit, so it > remains to be seen if that is desired. > > * Some issues exist in the new code with hashCode vs. equals. These are > probably real bugs, but I think they originate from very few places in > the code. I will try to reduce the set of these tests as much as > possible and then will report 1..n issues (with n expected to be small). If there are really bugs wrt the implementation of hashCode and equals I would consider them quite serious as problems there can lead to very subtle bugs in user code. But lets see what your tool has found and properly analyze the results. Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
