Am 09.01.2014 00:48, schrieb s...@apache.org: > Author: sebb > Date: Wed Jan 8 23:48:36 2014 > New Revision: 1556677 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1556677 > Log: > Oops, updated comment but not the value > > Modified: > commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/pom.xml > > Modified: commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/pom.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1556677&r1=1556676&r2=1556677&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/pom.xml (original) > +++ commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/pom.xml Wed Jan 8 23:48:36 2014 > @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ > <commons.jira.pid>12310460</commons.jira.pid> > <!-- limit memory size see BEANUTILS-291; allow command-line > override --> > <!-- Originally 25M, increased to 50M to get round Continuum CI > build failures --> > - <surefire.argLine>-Xmx25M</surefire.argLine> > + <surefire.argLine>-Xmx50M</surefire.argLine> > </properties> >
Thanks for looking into this. Did you make any progress? AIUI, the maximum memory parameter was set to a pretty low value to ensure that garbage collection happens in some of the memory leak tests. The whole concept seems to be fragile... Oliver > <reporting> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
