Notwithstanding the fact that we would have to redeploy all the component sites, wouldn't our URLs look better if we used the unadorned commons.componentid? e.g.
http://commons.apache.org/proper/lang http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/weaver etc. ? Matt On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:15 PM, <mben...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: mbenson > Date: Wed Aug 21 23:15:14 2013 > New Revision: 1516326 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1516326 > Log: > conform > > Modified: > commons/sandbox/weaver/trunk/pom.xml > > Modified: commons/sandbox/weaver/trunk/pom.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/weaver/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1516326&r1=1516325&r2=1516326&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- commons/sandbox/weaver/trunk/pom.xml (original) > +++ commons/sandbox/weaver/trunk/pom.xml Wed Aug 21 23:15:14 2013 > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ under the License. > <!--commons.jira.id>WEAVER</commons.jira.id> > <commons.jira.pid>666</commons.jira.pid--> > <asm.version>4.1</asm.version> > - <commons.scmPubUrl> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/commons/content/sandbox/${commons.componentid} > </commons.scmPubUrl> > + <commons.scmPubUrl> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/commons/content/sandbox/commons-${commons.componentid} > </commons.scmPubUrl> > </properties> > > <developers> > > >
