I prefer the distinct separation between sandbox and proper (although I've never understood why the word "proper" was chosen).
As for moving components I would suggest starting a DISCUSS thread and then, if appropriate, move to a vote thread. Ralph On Jun 21, 2013, at 7:22 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 21/06/2013 16:02, sebb a écrit : > >> Also, I don't think we should have code under proper that is not >> likely to be supported going forward. >> >> Users have the expectation that code under proper is mature and supported. > > It's doesn't prevent announcing a component as experimental with a clear > distinction on the website. My proposal is simply to drop the technical > distinction between proper and sandbox: same base directory in > Subversion, same ACLs. A component would simply "graduate" by reaching > the version 1.0. > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
