On 5 March 2013 08:34, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > 2013/3/5 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: >> On 5 March 2013 00:10, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: >>> 2013/3/5 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: >>>> On 4 March 2013 20:57, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> 2013/3/4 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> I just fixed the Digester download page by adding >>>>>> download_digester.cgi to to >>>>>> /websites/production/commons/content/proper/commons-digester/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there any need to have this file present anywhere else? >>>>>> >>>>>> i.e. if it is not added to src/site/resources, will it get lost when >>>>>> the site is regenerated? >>>>> yes. >>>>>> >>>>>> If so, what is if that deletes the file, and can it be persusaded not >>>>>> to delete it? >>>> >>>>> is it an issue to have this file in src/site/resources ? >>>> >>>> It's extra work. >>>> The file does not really belong in the source archive, so we have to >>>> update the assembly file as well. >>>> Also the RAT config may need to be updated to ignore the lack of an AL >>>> header in the file. >>> >>> so extra work to exclude it from scm publish :-) >> >> But if that can be done in the parent pom, it only has to be done once. > > As you prefer. > Perso I prefer the idea about having all the material we need for > building the site in the source tree. (see the issue with this > migration and various files which has been added manually it can be a > pain). But that's only my POV.
The download_xxx.cgi files are not needed to build the site. They are only needed for use on the apache web hosts - they won't actually work anywhere else without a lot of external setup. They don't change between releases; once created, they can be left alone. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
